wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

Patching our primary care system

at 10:55 AM ET, 04/03/2012

The United States is facing a serious primary care shortage: By one projection, we’re expected to be short by nearly 29,000 primary care physicians by 2015. In discussions of how to address that, one policy solution tends to come up a lot: Allow a wider range of lower-paid medical professionals to provide the basic, primary care often offered by doctors. It’s a seeming win-win, as more primary care gets provided at lower costs.

Take, for example, nurse practitioners. Their average salaries are less than half that of physicians. They’re trained to provide direct primary care, and numerous studies have shown that they can deliver high-quality medicine.

There’s just one small problem: Adding nurse practitioners to a doctor’s office, it turns out, sometimes is less cost-effective than adding a new physician. That’s the surprising finding from health-care economists Nan Liu and Thomas D’Aunno in a new article in the Health Research Service.

How, exactly, does adding a lower-paid employee make a doctor’s office less productive? A lot of it has to do with the limits of what a nurse practitioner can do. State laws often require a physician to supervise a nurse practitioner, leaving that doctor with less time to see patients.

Nurse practitioners could also increase the volume of medicine provided: If a patient comes to a nurse practitioner with a more complex condition, for example, they will likely need a second visit with the physician. If they’d seen a doctor in the first place, their condition would have likely been treated in one appointment.

There are certain ways to make the hiring of nurse practitioners more cost-effective. When Liu and D’Aunno run the numbers, they find that it works if a doctor delegates at least 30 percent of his workload to a nurse practitioner, spending their newfound time performing tasks that only physicians can take on. It’s not just about hiring on alternative primary care providers, they conclude, but ensuring that their services get used in the most effective ways.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein

    Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin

    Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff

    Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer

    Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews

    Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.

    Section:/blogs/ezra-klein