wpostServer: http://css.washingtonpost.com/wpost

President Obama: Pot-stirrer

at 12:08 PM ET, 06/15/2012

Whatever you want to say about President Obama, you have to give him some credit for one thing: He’s not afraid to stir the pot in the runup to the 2012 election.


President Obama speaks at a campaign event at Cuyahoga Community College in Cleveland, Ohio, on Thursday. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
First it was his administration’s decision to force religious institutions to provide birth control to their employees; then it was the president coming out (so to speak) in support of gay marriage; and now it’s the administration’s announcement that it will cease deporting young illegal immigrants who were brought to this country by their parents.

To the skeptic, all three decisions will seem politically motivated. But as with the first two, it’s not exactly clear just who the illegal immigration decision will wind up benefitting.

About the only thing that’s clear is that a can of worms has been opened.

One thing is abundantly clear: The decision certainly puts Mitt Romney and the Republican Party in a tough spot when it comes to wooing the Latino vote.

Republicans are already struggling mightily when it comes to this fast-growing demographic, and now the Obama administration has done something that should be very popular with Latinos, whose leadership has been pushing for this move for a long time.

Romney will now have to make a tough decision about whether to support the move. Illegal immigration is highly unpopular in conservative circles, to be sure, but the calculus changes for some in the middle when it comes to children who were brought to this country illegally by their parents.

(If you want a good example of the GOP’s struggles with the issue of young illegal immigrants, look no further than the DREAM Act debate in recent months.)

Adding to the equation is the fact that Romney has staked out some very conservative ground on the issue of illegal immigration, most notably his plan for so-called “self-deportation” that even some Republicans have balked at. Given that backdrop, this isn’t an easy call for him.

Conversely, we have to wonder what effect this has on staunch opponents of illegal immigration — many of whom are independents.

After all, despite the fact that we’re talking about young illegal immigrants, we’re still talking about illegal immigrants, and we’re still talking about something that can be labeled a form of “amnesty.”

Polling on this issue is all over the map, depending on how you ask the question, but a recent CNN/Opinion Research poll has some good insights.

In that poll, respondents were asked whether the U.S. government should focus on allowing illegal immigrants to become U.S. citizens, or stop the flow of illegal immigrants and deport those who are here.

Among independents, 54 percent said they favored the latter approach — a reflection of the fact that Americans aren’t opposed to deportation.

Another recent poll, though, shows that Obama’s decision could be construed as broadly popular. The CBS/New York Times poll showed that, given a trio of options, nearly two-thirds of Americans wanted to either provide a path to citizenship or allow the illegal immigrants to stay as guest workers. Just 32 percent said they should be required to leave the country.

In the end, this harkens back to both the president’s contraception and gay marriage decisions. All three moves are going to irritate conservatives, who were already irritated by the president, while earning plaudits from people who were already likely to support Obama.

The question will be how the middle sees it, and whether it spurs big Latino turnout for Obama.

Loading...

Comments

Add your comment
 
Read what others are saying About Badges

    Blog Contributors

    Chris Cillizza

    Chris Cillizza

    Chris Cillizza is founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009.

    Juliet Eilperin

    Juliet Eilperin

    Juliet Eilperin covers the White House for the Washington Post. She served as the Post's House of Representatives reporter from 1998-2004, covering the impeachment of Bill Clinton, lobbying, legislation, and five national congressional campaigns. Since 2004 she has been one of the country’s leading reporters covering the environment, reporting on science, policy and politics in areas including climate change, oceans, and air quality. She is the author of two books, "Fight Club Politics: How Partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives," and "Demon Fish: Travels Through the Hidden World of Sharks." Follow her on Twitter.

    Ed O’Keefe

    Ed O’Keefe

    Ed O’Keefe covers Congress and politics for the Washington Post. He previously covered the 2008 and 2012 campaigns and reported on federal agencies and federal employees as author of The Federal Eye blog. Follow Ed on Twitter.

    Aaron Blake

    Aaron Blake

    Aaron Blake covers national politics at the Washington Post, where he writes regularly for “The Fix,” the Post’s top political blog. A Minnesota native and summa cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota, Aaron has also written about politics for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The Hill newspaper. Aaron and his wife, Danielle, live in Annandale, Va. Follow him on Twitter.

    Sean Sullivan

    Sean Sullivan

    Sean Sullivan covers national politics for “The Fix.” Prior to joining the Washington Post in the summer of 2012, Sean was the editor of Hotline On Call, National Journal Hotline’s politics blog. He has also worked for NHK Japan Public Broadcasting and ABC News. Sean is a graduate of Hamilton College, where he received a degree in Philosophy. He lives in Washington, D.C. Follow Sean on Twitter.

    Scott Clement

    Scott Clement

    Scott Clement is a survey research analyst for Capital Insight, the independent polling group of Washington Post Media. Scott specializes in public opinion about politics, election campaigns and public policy. He helps design and analyze all Washington Post polls, including the Washington Post-ABC News poll. Follow Scott on Twitter.

    Rachel Weiner

    Rachel Weiner

    Rachel Weiner covers national politics for Post Politics and The Fix. She came to the Washington Post in 2010 as a political web editor and anchored the Post's 2012 election blog. She was previously a web editor at The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter.

    Section:/blogs/the-fix